Three Types of PMS — Discretionary, Non-Discretionary, Advisory
Definition
SEBI classifies Portfolio Management Services into three types based on the degree of decision-making authority delegated to the Portfolio Manager: Discretionary PMS (Manager makes all buy-sell decisions independently), Non-Discretionary PMS (Manager recommends, investor approves each transaction), and Advisory PMS (Manager only advises; investor executes through their own broker).
In Simple Words
In a Discretionary PMS, the investor signs a Power of Attorney that grants the Portfolio Manager full discretion to buy and sell securities in the demat account without seeking approval for each transaction. This is the most common form in India today (over 90% of PMS AUM) because it removes execution friction and allows the Manager to act on conviction quickly. The investor sees holdings and transactions through quarterly reports but is not consulted on individual trades. In a Non-Discretionary PMS, the Manager recommends each transaction but the investor must approve before execution. This suits investors who want to retain final decision-making — typically founders, business owners, or sophisticated investors who view the Manager as a research partner rather than a delegate. The operational friction (every trade requires a call or email) means few firms offer this structure today, and it is often slower in execution. In an Advisory PMS, the Manager only provides research and recommendations; the investor executes through their own broker. The Manager does not have access to the investor's demat. This is the lightest-touch structure — the investor pays for advisory expertise but bears all execution responsibility. It is also the least common in retail PMS distribution; most Advisory PMS arrangements are bespoke for ultra-HNI clients or family offices. The choice depends on three factors: the investor's desire for involvement, the Manager's value proposition (some Managers are pure stock-pickers; others add execution discipline), and operational practicality at the investor's wealth scale.
Real-Life Scenario
Three investors at the same liquid wealth level (₹3 crore each) make different PMS choices. Aniket, a 50-year-old senior banker in Mumbai, prefers Discretionary — he travels frequently for work and wants the Portfolio Manager to act without waiting for his approval. He signs the POA, allocates ₹50 lakh, and reviews the quarterly statements with his Relationship Manager. Sandeep, a 55-year-old tech entrepreneur in Bangalore, runs Non-Discretionary — he was a public-equity investor for 15 years before his startup years and wants to remain involved in stock-level decisions. He receives daily emails of recommended trades and approves or declines each. The Manager's strategy is more constrained because of his approval cycle, but Sandeep values the involvement. Krishnan, a 60-year-old former CFO with ₹15 crore liquid wealth and a personal broker network of 20 years, chooses Advisory — he pays the Manager a flat ₹5 lakh annual research fee for ideas, executes through his own broker, and integrates the Manager's ideas with his own research. Each structure suits a different investor — the choice is not about which is "best" but which fits the investor's personal involvement level and total ticket size.
Key Points to Remember
Frequently Asked Questions
Test Your Knowledge
3 questions to check your understanding
In a Discretionary PMS, who executes individual trades?
Summary Notes
Three PMS types vary by execution authority: Discretionary, Non-Discretionary, Advisory.
Discretionary is most common; choice depends on investor's involvement preference.
POA in Discretionary is limited to the agreed investment mandate — not unrestricted authority.
Ready to Apply What You Learned?
Now that you understand PMS Foundation, put it into practice with our free tools.
